I would like to point out to Sh. Mahabir Dhaiyaji that the provisions of Section 1(5) of the ESI Act, 1948 were not amended to align with the provisions of Section 1(3). Implementing the ESI Scheme in selected establishments falls well within the powers of the appropriate State Government under Section 1(5). However, there are still some State Governments, such as Maharashtra, that have not issued fresh notifications under the above provisions to bring the coverage of certain establishments in line with Section 1(3). There may be a few more states facing similar situations.
I would also like to correct Sh. Korgaonkarji that the State Government of Assam possibly issued a notification under Section 1(5) in 2012, reducing the coverage threshold of certain establishments to 10. If needed, I can conduct further research on this matter. It is worth mentioning that to the best of my knowledge, there are certain states, such as Gujarat and Pondicherry, that have not issued notifications under Section 1(5) covering medical or educational institutions. Hence, in my view, there is a lack of uniformity concerning the coverage of medical and educational institutions. The accuracy of this information needs to be verified with the relevant Regional/Sub/Divisional Office of ESIC.
Thank you.