Detailed Explanation Required On Legal/illegal Strike As Per Act

Dear Sirs,

I have some doubts regarding strikes and laws pertaining to that...

------------------------------------------------------

CHAPTER V - STRIKES AND LOCK-OUTS

22. Prohibition of strikes and lock-outs -

(1) No person employed in a public utility service shall go on strike, in breach of contract

(a) without giving to the employer notice of strike, as hereinafter provided, within six weeks before striking; or

My question: Workmen should provide 6 weeks notice before going on strike?? Is it mandatory to provide 6 weeks notice to employer?

(b) within fourteen days of giving such notice ; or

Question: Can they go for strike after 14 days of serving the strike notice? Please explain this sentence 22,(1) (b)

What is this 6 weeks and 14 days..!

(c) before the expiry of the date of strike specified in any such notice as

aforesaid; or

Question: They should not do strike before the end of 42nd day (6th week)??

Dear Stephan,

The questions you've raised are very important ones to every one interested in the subject of industrial relations. However, certain important explanatory notes on strikes and lock-outs preceding the direct answers you sought for may be of more help that I earnestly hope. Strike and Lock-Out are the double-edged weapons in the hands of employees and employers respectively and they do have a potential value of pressurisation in the matter of collective bargaining between them. But, strike is the most-talked about among the two because of its easy and frquent flare-ups and more-felt consequences on the economy and political governance. Of course,while Labour Laws relating to industrial relations like the Trade Unions Act,1926 and the Industrial Employment ( Standing Orders ) Act,1946 make mention about them, the Industrial Disputes Act,1947 provides for specific provisions regulating strike and lock-out. So, can we say the right to strike is a legal right? The Supreme Court of India, in its land-mark judgment delivered in T.K.Rangarajan v. Govt of TamilNadu and Others [ (2003) 6 S.C.C 581 ] has held that (1) there is no fundamental right to go on strike (2) there is no legal or statutory right to go on strike and (3) there is no moral or equitable justification to go on strike. It is to be noted that the case was relating to strike by lakhs of Govt.servants and their en masse dismissal. Therefore, the issue of strike by industrial employees has to be seen from the perspectives of universally accepted collective bargaining tactics and the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act,1947. The Act does not purport to take away the right to strike or lock-out but impliedly recognizes them by defining them, imposing certain restrictions on them and declaring them when not to be deemed as illegal strike or illegal lock-out. Delivering the judgment on behalf of the Bench, Hon'ble Justice Rajagopala Ayyangar of the Supreme Court in All India Bank Employees Association v.National Industrial Tribunal [ 1961 (II) LLJ 385 SC ] categorically observed that the right to strike or the right to declare lock-out may be controlled or restricted by proper industrial legislation and the validity of such legislation would have to be decided not with reference to the criteria laid down in Art.19(4) of the Constitution but on totally different considerations.

Now, I shall answer all your questions at a stretch:

(1) Six weeks or 42 days is the maximum notice period and 14 days is the minimum notice period for the date of strike proposed. In other words, you can not go on strike after the expiry of the 42nd day without a fresh notice and you can not resort to strike within 14 days from the date of notice i.e 14 days must have elapsed from the date of notice to the date of strike.