Of course, you've given a brief and apt answer, and the questioner might be well aware of the answer. If you really want to translate the answer in terms of tangible results, better first identify the areas in every activity, say inventory, production, sales, and the like, where deficiencies are noticed. Then select the type of training and its modules befitting the purpose, and effective trainers for the purpose. Whether the organization is small or large, the training imparted should simultaneously cover all the inter-related activities or departments to have a holistic effect.
For example, the effective handling of inventory depends upon the combined coordination of the Purchase Dept or the Materials Dept, Production Dept, and the Sales Dept. More than required stocks of inventory in the form of raw materials or semi-finished products or finished products will certainly result in unnecessary locking up of working capital. Therefore, the personnel of these departments should first be trained to develop a mindset of interdependence and plan their activities in consultation with one another to keep the stock position, irrespective of their type, in optimal quantities.
If the production dept encounters a higher rate of rejection and re-working, the supervisors or unit heads should be well-trained to identify the actual reasons such as defective raw materials, insufficient maintenance and handling of machinery, lack of coordination among the various segments of the assembly line, and the like. Even the conservancy staff have to be trained effectively to understand the importance of their job, which plays a vital role in the upkeep of cleanliness and hygiene of the entire premises. Better form a Training Committee comprising the heads of all departments.