With due regards to all members who contributed to this thread above, I humbly submit that the position of coverage under the ESI Act, 1948, as mentioned, appears to be unclear. I would like to summarize the position as follows:
1. Under the said Act, coverage applies to two types of establishments: factories and establishments (as specified in the notifications). Coverage for factories is determined by Section 1(3) of the Act, while coverage for establishments falls under Section 1(5).
2. Following amendments in 2010, a factory's coverage under the Act now requires employing 10 or more persons. The use of power for manufacturing processes and a minimum coverage of 10 or more persons (earning wages within the wage ceiling) are no longer necessary. Even if only one person out of 10 in a factory earns wages within the coverage limit (currently up to and including ₹15,000), the factory is still covered by the Act, and the principal employer must ensure compliance.
3. Establishments' coverage is determined by notifications issued by the appropriate government, with State Governments typically handling establishments not governed by the Central Government. Most State Governments (excluding Maharashtra, etc.) have issued fresh notifications aligning specified establishments' coverage with that of factories under Section 1(3).
4. However, in areas like Pune or other regions of Maharashtra and some states, the situation may differ as some State Governments have not issued fresh notifications under Section 1(5) in alignment with Section 1(3). Information on which State Governments have issued new notifications post-amendments in the ESI Act, 1948, can be obtained from the respective Regional Offices of the ESIC. For instance, the Government of Gujarat issued a notification dated 03/01/2012, and the Government of Andhra Pradesh issued a revised notification dated 21/04/2011.
5. In my view, except for certain states like Maharashtra, shops, hotels, restaurants, etc. (qualifying as specified establishments) that employ 10 or more persons are covered under the Act, regardless of how many earn wages below the coverage limit mentioned above. In states where fresh notifications under Section 1(5) have not been issued, the coverage of specified establishments will follow earlier notifications from the respective Governments.
I recommend that all members interested in coverage under the ESI Act, 1948, especially HR professionals, review the amended provisions of the Act, particularly the definition of a factory in Section 2(22), and confirm the status of State Government notifications issued under Section 1(5) within their jurisdiction before forming any opinions. For areas like Pune in Maharashtra, it is advisable to confirm the local situation before determining coverage of such units.
Thank you.