Your information is not complete and sufficient, deserving appropriate citation of reference as asked for. However, let me try to give my answer based on what I am able to cull out from your brief post.
Legal Position on Government Servant Suspension
It is a well-settled legal position that the Government has an implied power to place a Government servant under suspension pending the completion of the departmental inquiry (Narayan Prasad Rewary v. State of Orissa - AIR 1957 Ori 51). In other words, the employer is regarded as issuing an order to the employee which, because the contract is subsisting, the employee must obey (Gurudeva Narayana Srivatsava v. State of Bihar - AIR 1955 Pat.131).
You have vaguely mentioned that on concocted grounds the suspension was ordered, which means that you raise a question about the justification of the very order of suspension. If the power to appoint or dismiss is administrative power, it follows that the power to suspend a Government servant is also an administrative power. That being so, the suspended Government servant is not entitled to an opportunity of explanation for the order of suspension. It has been categorically held in D.N. Ganju v. State of J&K - (AIR 1964 J&K 14) that the High Court, while exercising power in a writ, cannot go into the question of whether an order suspending a Government servant was or was not based on proper material. If the petitioner was able to show that it was passed by an authority not competent to pass, the position would be different.