Dear Vijayan,
Namaste. I had also faced a similar situation where not only employees arrived late, but even seniors took the liberty of arriving well beyond the stipulated office timings.
Implementing a Flexible Punctuality Rule
I enforced a similar rule, but in a different manner. Since the employees in our organization were quite senior, deducting leaves would not have been beneficial.
• The office timing was given a grace period up to 9:45 a.m. (actual office timing - 9:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.). If an employee arrived after 9:46 a.m., they would have to stay back until 6:30 p.m., even if they did not have any pending work.
• If an employee was delayed and arrived after 10:00 a.m., up to 2 genuine reasons were allowed in a month at the HOD's discretion. Beyond that, half a day's salary was deducted, not from the wages but collected as an employee fund. In the last 3 months, no deductions have been made, as the collection occurred only in the first month, which is currently held in the office to be used for employee welfare or as employees see fit.
Following the implementation of this rule, no one has been late. Even if someone is late, they must have approval from the HOD, and no HOD can continuously provide reasons for tardiness, even if the late employee is a top performer.
Additionally, if an employee faces a contingency and will be late by more than 2 hours, half a day's casual leave is granted. However, this can only be done after the employee arrives and sends an email for approval from their HOD to all HODs and HR. This system ensures total transparency, and no one takes advantage.
It has been over 4 months since this rule was implemented, and there have been no instances of tardiness. Employees usually apply for half days instead.
Best Regards,
Bharati Joshi