While endorsing Ajeetvarma50 and BS Kalsi, I would like to add the following:
Gratuity as a Statutory Right
Gratuity is a statutory right. An opportunity should be given to the employee to be heard as to why his gratuity should not be forfeited.
Case Reference: D.V. Kapoor v. Union of India
In the case of D.V. Kapoor v. Union of India AIR 1990 SUPREME COURT 1923, the appellant was neither charged with nor given an opportunity regarding the withholding of his gratuity as a form of punishment. No provision of law has been cited which empowers the President to withhold gratuity as a punitive measure post-retirement. Hence, it has been determined that the order to withhold gratuity as a penalty is clearly illegal and lacks jurisdiction.
Section 4 (6) (1) of the Gratuity Act
I am also including section 4 (6) (1) verbatim for easy reference:
- (a) The gratuity of an employee, whose services have been terminated due to any act, willful omission, or negligence causing damage or loss to the employer's property, shall be forfeited to the extent of the damage or loss incurred;
- (b) The gratuity payable to an employee shall be entirely forfeited if:
- (i) the employee's services have been terminated due to riotous or disorderly conduct, or any violent act on his part, or
- (ii) the employee's services have been terminated for an act constituting an offense involving moral turpitude, provided such offense was committed during his employment.
Thank you.
Best regards