In addition to what Saswata Sir advised,
I would like you to initiate the process before they do so.
In actual terms, a service bond is viable in India to the extent of the training cost incurred on the employee by the employer.
There is no specifications of training given in the bond that you've signed. Not even have they mentioned that they'd provide you a training.
You mentioned in your next post about 6 months of training period and ___ months of probation period. Perhaps you missed the number or should I assume the normal 6 month's probation?
From your post I deduce that you have joined the company in Jan this year. So basically the bond starts from your joining date.
Secondly, I want you to check your appointment letter for termination clause as in the service agreement details are not mentioned.
Ideally, in the probation period, there is no need to serve a notice period or if at all a notice period is asked, it ranges from 7 to 15 days' time. Your service agreement mentions a 2month's notice. However, such long notices are usually meant for confirmed employees. So check if there is any specifications in your appointment letter.
In addition you can write the foll mail/letter to the concerned authority w.r.t. the agreement you have signed -
As per the clause 2 of the service agreement that we have signed on DATE,
I am to get the remuneration for the service during the period as mentioned in my appointment letter.
In my appointment letter, I have been promised a gross monthly salary of Rs. _____ per month.
However, I would like to bring to your notice that since past two months, I have not been getting my salary for reasons best known to the management.
This letter is to bring to your notice that I have waited for 2 months to receive my salary check and it was futile. Hence, I would here by wish to state that unless my previous salary is processed, I will not be in a position to serve you.
Kindly, acknowledge the reciept of this mail/letter stating the earliest that my salary for the said tenure will be processed.
See, we know that the bond is questionable and is not viable, but irrespective of this clause in the agreement, every person who has rendered any simple service is liable to get a pay for that.
To cite an example....
Once my TV was not working properly and we called in many technicians but they didn't know what to do. One person walked in, he checked and politely said, "Sir, you do not need to give the TV to any technicians or workshop. I'll repair it here itself in 5 min. But I will charge you 200 Rs." (This happened some 25 odd years back when 200Rs, had its own value)
My dad was happy that now he's satisfied the technicians won't change the parts as he's not to take it anywhere from here. So he agreed.
All that he did was tightened a screw and the TV worked.
It was just a simple thing to do but he charged a bomb. Now are we to tell him that tightening a screw don't cost that big????
It wasn't about tightening that screw.... It was about applying his knowledge and giving you a service quicker than anyone else...
And to be frank this person earned so much of respect, till date, he's the only one who's allowed to repair my TV and we don't go to market to check what other's charge as we trust his service....