Kumar s,
I differ slightly on the above.It is possible that A is not covering E under esic because his salary is above 15000 or that the location is not covered by esic. In that case, not giving esic is ok, but PF can not be stopped as long as he is working there.
In case of B, he should be paying PF as the employee has existing PF account. PF rules allow getting PF from 2 different employers at the same time.
I think he should get esic from B in any case so long as his gross wages from B does not exceed 15000. Else B will have a problem explaining it to the authorities.
I agree, E should ask A not to discontinue the payment of PF as it will cause problems for A.
Of course we are assuming that A is aware if and approves the part time employment.
Incidentally, factory act prohibits double employment. If both A and B are factories, then it is the duty of both employers to prevent the employee from working in 2 places.
I differ slightly on the above.It is possible that A is not covering E under esic because his salary is above 15000 or that the location is not covered by esic. In that case, not giving esic is ok, but PF can not be stopped as long as he is working there.
In case of B, he should be paying PF as the employee has existing PF account. PF rules allow getting PF from 2 different employers at the same time.
I think he should get esic from B in any case so long as his gross wages from B does not exceed 15000. Else B will have a problem explaining it to the authorities.
I agree, E should ask A not to discontinue the payment of PF as it will cause problems for A.
Of course we are assuming that A is aware if and approves the part time employment.
Incidentally, factory act prohibits double employment. If both A and B are factories, then it is the duty of both employers to prevent the employee from working in 2 places.