I agree with B.K. Bhatia's comments and the three questions that he has put forward. Other relevant questions can be:
- To which function does this senior employee belong?
- What is the opinion of his Reporting Officer?
Simply saying, "Have noticed a drop in quality of a senior employee" is not sufficient. "Drop in quality" of what? Is it dress, attitude, informal or formal participation, punctuality, relationship, and interaction with other employees?
If it is performance, then what are the criteria, what are his tasks and targets, what is the end-date of this year's performance appraisal period, and what are his ratings? What were the comments of his Reporting and Reviewing Officers?
One should remember that HR is in no position to JUDGE the PERFORMANCE of employees in other functions like Production, Sales, Client Service, Finance & Accounts, etc. Neither is it competent, nor does it have the opportunity to do so, as HR is not a party to all the activities of an organization, nor is it empowered to do so.
Moreover, one should not equate performance with the outward appearance or behavior of the person. Condemning a person like this is unfair and an injustice to that person. Several times, in their over-enthusiasm and over-zealousness, young HR persons make the mistake of having the impression that "they are the lord of whomsoever they survey"!!!
Such erroneous thinking is bad for the organization. It is like the story of the proverbial monkey with the razor trying to become the barber - it is always possible that the neck gets slashed instead of the beard.
As far as judgment on performance is concerned, suo moto it should be restricted to one's own subordinates or those who report directly.
Hope I have not hurt the feelings of anyone by coming down heavily on such impropriety or proposed action, which may be unfair to someone for no fault of his on the performance front, which can be judged only by his KRAs under a good PMS or the unbiased opinion of his reporting officers.
Warm regards.