As per the schedule of the Maharashtra PT Act, each coparcener, not being a minor, is required to enroll under the PT Act and pay Rs. 2,500/- as tax. However, it is not clear whether a Karta of HUF is required to be enrolled.
I have come across an instance where the Karta of HUF is already holding an enrollment certificate for himself and paying tax annually. But even then, apart from PT registration, a separate enrollment is being mandated in the name of the Karta for a business started by the HUF.
Is this correct as per the act? If not, can the Karta request for the PT already paid under this enrollment, against proof that he is already enrolled as a person and paying PT.
I have come across an instance where the Karta of HUF is already holding an enrollment certificate for himself and paying tax annually. But even then, apart from PT registration, a separate enrollment is being mandated in the name of the Karta for a business started by the HUF.
Is this correct as per the act? If not, can the Karta request for the PT already paid under this enrollment, against proof that he is already enrolled as a person and paying PT.