Incident Overview
In Transport Corporation, a driver caused a fatal accident in which 8 persons died and 18 others were injured on 4-11-11. The driver was suspended pending an inquiry, which lasted for six months. During this period, the management did not provide any subsistence allowance to him. The ACL ordered the payment of the allowance, but the management has not complied. In the meantime, the EO submitted his findings, stating that the driver was responsible for the accident. Based on this report, he was dismissed from service with effect from 5-11-11, the day after the accident occurred.
Consideration for Appeal
Now, the management is considering filing an appeal against the ACL's order. The question arises: on what grounds should we base our appeal? Is the retrospective effect the correct approach? Please share your views on this matter at your earliest convenience.
Regards,
S. Elango, Member
In Transport Corporation, a driver caused a fatal accident in which 8 persons died and 18 others were injured on 4-11-11. The driver was suspended pending an inquiry, which lasted for six months. During this period, the management did not provide any subsistence allowance to him. The ACL ordered the payment of the allowance, but the management has not complied. In the meantime, the EO submitted his findings, stating that the driver was responsible for the accident. Based on this report, he was dismissed from service with effect from 5-11-11, the day after the accident occurred.
Consideration for Appeal
Now, the management is considering filing an appeal against the ACL's order. The question arises: on what grounds should we base our appeal? Is the retrospective effect the correct approach? Please share your views on this matter at your earliest convenience.
Regards,
S. Elango, Member