Legal Framework for Disciplinary Action Against Trade Union Leaders
There is no law that protects a non-performing or troublesome trade union leader. Section 33(3) of the Industrial Disputes Act, which deals with protected employees (of a trade union), only states that during a pending dispute in conciliation before a Labour Officer or Courts, disciplinary action cannot be taken against a protected laborer without permission from the conciliation officer/labor court. However, if disciplinary action is initiated for misconduct not related to the pending dispute, action can be taken even if the person is a protected worker.
Challenges in Framing Charges
In theory, there is nothing illegal in taking action against a trade union member. However, in practice, it is very difficult to frame charges against the worker, especially when it relates to 'attitude,' which is non-measurable or unquantifiable human behavior. Charges like theft, insubordination, smoking inside the factory premises, or sleeping while on duty are provable and quantifiable. On the other hand, labeling a worker's attitude as bad is subjective, as different individuals may perceive it differently. There might be followers or witnesses supporting the worker, saying the attitude is not bad or even good.
Evaluating Employee Productivity
If charges can be based on employee productivity, a comparative study of the average output per worker should be conducted. This analysis should consider qualifications, experience, training, and employee grade to conclude that the union leader is not meeting expectations. The disciplinary process should be thorough to avoid being seen as victimizing a long-term union leader.
Practical Considerations
Initiating disciplinary action against a union leader may lead to non-cooperation from workers following them, resulting in further production losses. It is essential to be practical and conduct thorough preparation before dealing with such employees.
Regards,
Madhu.T.K