It has been noticed that there is utter confusion about the registration of an 'establishment' under the Contract Labour Act. Most people think that the Principal Employer has to get himself registered. Others think that the Company (client) has to get itself registered as an establishment. I feel that it is the establishment where the contract labour is employed or is to be employed that is required to be registered as an 'establishment,' and the responsibility to get it registered lies with the 'Principal Employer' of a company who desires to get the work done through a contractor.
For example, ABC is a company that wants to hire a contractor to build a 'Mall' at a place Y. The person X is the Managing Director (Principal Employer) of the company ABC. In this situation, X has to make an application to the Registering Officer to get the establishment, i.e., the 'Mall,' registered under the CLRA.
What is the opinion of the members of this forum?
Regards,
jpratap
For example, ABC is a company that wants to hire a contractor to build a 'Mall' at a place Y. The person X is the Managing Director (Principal Employer) of the company ABC. In this situation, X has to make an application to the Registering Officer to get the establishment, i.e., the 'Mall,' registered under the CLRA.
What is the opinion of the members of this forum?
Regards,
jpratap