Respected All Readers,
In recent years, corporations have been implementing the C-2-C (Cost to Company) concept to determine the salaries of both newly recruited and existing employees. The components of Cost to Company are as follows:
1. Basic Salary (25% of C-2-C, with a minimum of 6526/- per month for employees with a C-2-C of 7000/- per month. For employees earning less than 7000/- per month, it is 4350/- (the minimum wage prescribed by law for skilled individuals).
2. Special Pay (Difference between C-2-C and total expenditure on all accounts).
3. House Rent Allowance at 50% of Basic Salary.
4. Statutory Bonus at 11% of Basic Salary.
5. Company's Contribution towards ESIC at 4.75% of total emoluments less PF Contribution.
6. Company's Contribution towards PF at 12% of Basic Salary.
7. Encashment of Earned Leave at 1 day for every 20 days worked.
8. Gratuity at Basic Annual Salary divided by 26 multiplied by 15 days.
I kindly request all readers to provide their valuable input on the validity and final outcome of this approach in the context of long-term HR relationships with employees and in terms of reducing attrition.
Regards,
Jawaharlal Moondra
In recent years, corporations have been implementing the C-2-C (Cost to Company) concept to determine the salaries of both newly recruited and existing employees. The components of Cost to Company are as follows:
1. Basic Salary (25% of C-2-C, with a minimum of 6526/- per month for employees with a C-2-C of 7000/- per month. For employees earning less than 7000/- per month, it is 4350/- (the minimum wage prescribed by law for skilled individuals).
2. Special Pay (Difference between C-2-C and total expenditure on all accounts).
3. House Rent Allowance at 50% of Basic Salary.
4. Statutory Bonus at 11% of Basic Salary.
5. Company's Contribution towards ESIC at 4.75% of total emoluments less PF Contribution.
6. Company's Contribution towards PF at 12% of Basic Salary.
7. Encashment of Earned Leave at 1 day for every 20 days worked.
8. Gratuity at Basic Annual Salary divided by 26 multiplied by 15 days.
I kindly request all readers to provide their valuable input on the validity and final outcome of this approach in the context of long-term HR relationships with employees and in terms of reducing attrition.
Regards,
Jawaharlal Moondra