I am working in a small IT company in Bangalore, India. We have a misleading superannuation fund in our salary component, which was started effective from 1st April 2007, but it was not mentioned in any of the HR policies, employee handbook, or in any notice/circular. Whenever it was asked by an employee to HR, it was explained verbally and not by email or any official communication that it is not maintained by LIC but company-managed, and the eligibility for this fund is 5 years.
As far as we know, the company has not established any trust and is not investing in secure bonds or any such thing for employee benefit. In the last week of completion of 5 years, the COO of the company informed HR to publish a policy in the HR portal and mention the Superannuation Policy, which will have the eligibility criteria as retirement from the company at the age of 58 years.
How fair is this? Can the company do this?
As far as we know, the company has not established any trust and is not investing in secure bonds or any such thing for employee benefit. In the last week of completion of 5 years, the COO of the company informed HR to publish a policy in the HR portal and mention the Superannuation Policy, which will have the eligibility criteria as retirement from the company at the age of 58 years.
How fair is this? Can the company do this?