Based on the said judgment (Mettur Beardsell Ltd, Madras vs. Regional Labour Commissioner), the Payment of Gratuity Act has not been amended. Therefore, the entitlement for gratuity remains the same, i.e., 5 years of continuous service. The verdict in the Madras High Court cannot be made applicable to all states. The Andhra Pradesh High Court has held in P Raghavalu & Sons vs. Addl. Labour Court that a service of 4 years 11 months and 10 days will not make an employee entitled to gratuity. Similar cases have also been reported in various other states. Therefore, unless an amendment is made to make the employee eligible for gratuity by treating his 240 days of service in the fifth year as one year, it is difficult to decide on it. However, considering the payment as a social welfare measure, a liberal interpretation shall be made by the employer.
Regards,
Madhu.T.K