Dear Mr. J. S. Malik,
Supreme Court Ruling on Gratuity Eligibility
It's not only the Madras High Court, but the Hon. Supreme Court has also ruled that if an employee has completed 240 days in the 5th year of their service, they are eligible for gratuity.
"Judgment from Supreme Court:
"Yes, by virtue of the judgment of the Supreme Court rendered under the provisions of the Industrial Dispute Act in Surendra Kumar Verma vs. Central Govt. Industrial Tribunal, [(1980) (4) S.C.C.433)], it is enough that an employee has a service of 240 days in the preceding 12 months, and it is not necessary that they should have completed one whole year's service. As the definition of continuous service in the Industrial Dispute Act and Payment of Gratuity Act are synonymous, the same principle can be adopted under the act also, and hence an employee rendering service of 4 years 10 months 11 days is considered to have completed 5 years of continuous service under sec.4(2) and thereby is eligible for gratuity."
It's true that the Payment of Gratuity Act has not been amended to accommodate the judgment of the Hon. Supreme Court, but at the same time, judgments passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India become law as per Article 141 of the Constitution of India.
Amendments and References to Supreme Court Judgments
We should also not forget that when the Payment of Gratuity Act was amended in 2009 to redefine/widen the term "EMPLOYEE," the amendment bill (introduced in Parliament) gave a clear reference to the Supreme Court judgment of 2004 in which the court had widened the definition of the term 'employee.' The act was amended just to accommodate the court ruling.
Not only that, though the act was amended and notified in the Gazette of India in 2009, it was effective from 3rd April 1997 just because the case "Ahmedabad Private Primary Teachers' Association vs. Administrative Officer and others," in which the Supreme Court gave said judgment, was started in 1997.
Current Status and Ongoing Discussions
So we just can't say that members are discussing the topic without any valid reason. Until the act is amended and notified, people will keep discussing the topic as the present status of the act on eligibility criteria is confusing. People are taking it both ways.
Regards,
Kamal