Hi Folks,
I work for a construction company. As the nature of the work requires, we work 365 days a year.
The problem is we have three classes of employment:
1. Employees on permanent rolls.
2. Employees on particular projects.
3. Employees appointed at a particular project by the local authority.
All classes work on Sundays, and whenever they take leaves, it is adjusted against their Sunday compensatory off first. If there is no pending Sunday compensatory off, then their leave is adjusted against their mandatory leaves.
We pay during the final clearance, including the unutilized Sunday compensatory off, to site employees (locally employed). However, we do not pay those appointed by the head office (HO) as they do not take as much leave. When they resign, we do not pay their unutilized Sunday balance leaves.
In my opinion, this is a wrong practice. We should either pay everyone or no one.
How should we address this issue? Not paying the Sunday compensatory payment to HO-appointed employees is causing problems. Can they go to court for settlement? I believe they can, especially after the management has been reminded of the potential consequences and remains silent.
Your thoughts, please.
With Regards,
R. Sudhakar
I work for a construction company. As the nature of the work requires, we work 365 days a year.
The problem is we have three classes of employment:
1. Employees on permanent rolls.
2. Employees on particular projects.
3. Employees appointed at a particular project by the local authority.
All classes work on Sundays, and whenever they take leaves, it is adjusted against their Sunday compensatory off first. If there is no pending Sunday compensatory off, then their leave is adjusted against their mandatory leaves.
We pay during the final clearance, including the unutilized Sunday compensatory off, to site employees (locally employed). However, we do not pay those appointed by the head office (HO) as they do not take as much leave. When they resign, we do not pay their unutilized Sunday balance leaves.
In my opinion, this is a wrong practice. We should either pay everyone or no one.
How should we address this issue? Not paying the Sunday compensatory payment to HO-appointed employees is causing problems. Can they go to court for settlement? I believe they can, especially after the management has been reminded of the potential consequences and remains silent.
Your thoughts, please.
With Regards,
R. Sudhakar