Supreme Court Judgment on Worker Compensation
The Supreme Court, in its important judgment dated 19.11.2011 (copy attached), held that workers cannot be forced to work under new management without their consent. In such an event, they are entitled to retirement/retrenchment compensation under the Industrial Disputes Act.
In this case, Philips India Ltd. had entered into an agreement for the sale of its consumer electronics factory in Salt Lake City, Calcutta, with Kitchen Appliances India Ltd. Some of the workers opposed the move and demanded compensation. The management argued that the workers had neither been retired, resigned, nor retrenched; hence, the question of compensation should not arise. This argument was turned down by the court.
A copy of the judgment is attached.
The Supreme Court, in its important judgment dated 19.11.2011 (copy attached), held that workers cannot be forced to work under new management without their consent. In such an event, they are entitled to retirement/retrenchment compensation under the Industrial Disputes Act.
In this case, Philips India Ltd. had entered into an agreement for the sale of its consumer electronics factory in Salt Lake City, Calcutta, with Kitchen Appliances India Ltd. Some of the workers opposed the move and demanded compensation. The management argued that the workers had neither been retired, resigned, nor retrenched; hence, the question of compensation should not arise. This argument was turned down by the court.
A copy of the judgment is attached.
1 Attachment(s) [Login To View]