I didn't find any reasonable reply. Please observe my submission. If there are any errors, you can advise me.
Evolution of the HR Department
In earlier days, before the multinational company culture entered, the department that took care of the employees was called the Personnel Department. Nowadays, with the rise of multinational companies, especially in software sectors, the term "HR department" has become popular. Even though there were HR branches in universities, in employment, the term "Personnel Department" was renowned.
This shift has resulted in every organization now using the terminology of HR without truly understanding what HR entails. Consequently, many private companies engage employees under the name of HR but fail to provide the necessary facilities required for the HR department. Employers often discuss HR values and activities, but most engage HR personnel in very small numbers, leading to tremendous pressure on them.
Challenges Faced by HR Departments
Most managements treat the HR department as a service-providing department rather than an organizational development department. In many companies, HR is treated as a lower category with little recognition for HR personnel, even after years of service. Management expects the following from the HR department:
- Service provision to all other departments.
- Service provision to all company management personnel.
- Service provision to all employees of the organization.
- All administrative activities.
- All statutory activities.
- All service activities.
- All liaisoning activities.
- All Industrial Relations activities.
- All relations maintenance activities.
- All medical facilities-related activities.
- All accidents-related activities.
However, these expectations are not met with sufficient manpower in the HR department. In my observation, even with 500 or more employees, a single HR person manages in most companies. Based on my experience, for the first 50 persons, one HR person is enough. After 50, one HR person is required for every one hundred employees to ensure 100% compliance in all aspects, using the HR terminology instead of the Personnel department.
Despite all these observations, people are replying at their own levels.
Regards