Dear Franklin and others,
I am sorry to say this. There are innumerable establishments that evade PF for their employees. There is no escape for government departments, companies, and private firms; all are cheats and robbers of poor employees. I have worked in government (state and central), PSUs, private firms, and companies. This lawlessness is rampant everywhere. For the sake of employment, poor people keep silent. Many PSUs engage thousands through contractors, terminate them after some time to avoid all these benefits, and reengage them through some other fictitious contractors or names. These actions happen in connivance with corrupt PF/ESI officials. In this regard, private firms are somewhat better compared to government firms.
The pathetic situation is that many employers recover PF subscriptions from their employees but fail to remit them to the PFO. In many firms, employees leaving the establishment are not able to obtain their PF settlement because the establishments didn't remit the contributions to the PFO.
Franklin, please note: The PF administration/inspection charges are either payable by the PF Trusts or by the employer to the PF Commissioner, and the same is not 13.61% as you mentioned. Please note these points:
Employer Coverage
- Establishments employing 20 or more persons and engaged in any of the 180 industries or classes of businesses specified.
- Co-operative societies employing 50 or more persons and working without the aid of power.
- Establishments not coverable statutorily can come under the coverage of the Act voluntarily.
- An establishment continues to be covered under the Act, irrespective of the fall in the employment strength.
- Since the Act applies on its own force to the establishments, the employers are required to file the particulars in the specified format for registration and allotment of a business number.
Financial Obligations
Contributions:
- Statutory rate of contribution is 12% of emoluments (basic wages, dearness allowance, cash value of food concession, and retaining allowances if any) in the case of 175 establishments.
- Rate of contribution shall be 10% in the case of the following:
- Brick, beedi, jute, guar gum factories, coir industry other than the spinning sector.
- Establishments declared as sick undertakings by BIFR.
- A matching contribution is to be collected from the emoluments of the employees.
- Out of 12% (or 10% as the case may be) of the employer's share of contribution, 8.33% is to be remitted towards the pension fund.
- Employer is also required to pay a contribution of 0.5% of the emoluments towards EDLIS'1976.
Administrative Charges:
- An employer is required to pay administrative charges at 1.10% of emoluments towards provident fund charges and 0.01% towards the EDLI Scheme 1976.
- No separate administrative charges for the pension scheme.
Inspection Charges:
- In respect of exempted establishments under the P.F. Scheme, the employer is liable to pay only inspection charges at the rate of 0.18% of emoluments.
- In the case of establishments exempted from the EDLI Scheme, the employer is required to pay only inspection charges at the rate of 0.005% of emoluments.
Interest Liability:
- For belated remittances of contributions, administrative/inspection charges interest at the rate of 12% on such remittances for the period of delay is to be remitted.
I hope this will be of help to you all.
For further information, browse this link:
EPFO <link updated to site home>
With regards,
kumar.s.