The answer to your query raised in your last post depends on the nature of work performed by the Sub Assistant Engineer. The Factories Act by itself does not prescribe a remedy if the overtime wages are not paid to a "worker" as defined under the Factories Act. One has to look into the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947.
Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act of 1947
Section 33C(2) provides that "Where any workman is entitled to receive from the employer any money or any benefit which is capable of being computed in terms of money... may be decided by such Labour Court... within a period not exceeding three months." Therefore, a "workman" as defined under section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, if he is also a "worker" as defined under the Factories Act, and if he is not paid overtime wages as provided for under the Factories Act, can file a petition under section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act to claim the overtime wages.
Eligibility of Sub Assistant Engineer
In the issue raised by you, the Sub Assistant Engineer referred to by you may be a "workman" as defined under the Factories Act, but it is debatable whether he fits the definition of a "workman" according to section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act. If the SAE is not a "workman" as defined under the Industrial Disputes Act, he cannot file a claim under section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act. Alternatively, the SAE can file a claim petition under the Payment of Wages Act if he falls within the applicability clause of the Payment of Wages Act contained in Section 1(4) read with section 1(6) of the Payment of Wages Act.
If neither the Industrial Disputes Act nor the Payment of Wages Act are applicable to the SAE, then in my view, he can file a civil suit against the employer for the money due to him.
With regards,