Please go through a circular of ESIC giving clarifications on various items as to its applicability for coverage and contribution. It says that AMC is outside the purview of ESI contribution. Moreover, it is a payment given to an agency not based on the actual days of working or labour involved. There is no commitment that this much of services should be done and the Principal employer does not know the number of persons engaged for the purpose. It is reproduced in Hassan Cooperative Milk Producers' Society Union Ltd Vs. Asst Regional Director, ESI Corporation (2010 LLR 561) that if the employer has no idea about the number of persons to be engaged by the contractor, the principal employer- labour relationship can not be proved. The case of AMC is also similar and moreover, it is a lumpsum amount paid from which labour cost can not be taken out separately.
Statutory canteen is a concept in Factories Act. If a factory is employing 250 employees and the state govt. has issued notifications regarding setting up of a canteen for the benefit of the employees, then that canteen will be treated as statutory canteen and the employees of that canteen will be covered by ESI and EPF. Therefore, if in an IT company a shop is functioning then the employees will not become employees of the IT company. However, if there is a settlement or an understanding with the employees that you will be getting the benefit of easy shopping within the compound either at a concessional rate or at a credit rate adjustable/ recoverable from salary or with a similar arrangements, then it will become every easy for the ESI authorities to establish that the canteens/ malls are run by the employer or set up for the benefit of employees as part of their welfare schemes (which would directly or indirectly would have hit the CTC agreed) and if so, the employees of that canteen/ malls will be treated as labour of the employer.
Regards,
Madhu.T.K