Dear Sir,
I came to understand from the case law, Ismail Papamia Vs Labour Appellate Tribunal of India (AIR 1956 Bombay 584) a Division Bench of the Bombay HC held that non-compliance with Sec.9 would not make the provisions of Sec.7 not effective or binding as the lanugage used in Sec.9 by the legislature is intended to give effect merely to a directory provision and not a mandatory provision.
You are also mentioned that, the standing orders in regional language is only given as reference purpose for the purpose better understanding of provisons, regulations covered therein. In such a eventualtity, the copy of draft standing order in regional language may be displayed on the notice board.
Is it legally correct under TNRules,a draft standing orders to be submitted in 5 sets in both the language for certification. I appreciate your views and response in this context.