Optimizing Designations for Employee Roles in HR Activities

8Mohan8
Hi Seniors,

This is Mohan. I am in the process of implementing HR activities in my company. My office contains only 07 persons, and everybody is involved in all tasks without a designated system since my joining. Over the past month, I have organized everything into a system. However, there is still one issue remaining - "DESIGNATION" only.

Therefore, I need a designation for the employee who is responsible for the following activities:

01) Salary maintenance
02) ESI, PF, insurance maintenance
03) Recruiting someone
04) Proficient in basic accounts
05) Purchasing materials
06) Store room management
07) Quoting new tenders

I am very confused when considering the role for this employee. Please share your suggestions. I appreciate your input.

Thank you.
vikash1017
Hi Mohan,

You have not mentioned their experiences; however, you can design their designation as per experience and qualifications as follows:

1. 0 to 3 years - Executive
2. 3.1 years to 5 years - Sr. Executive
3. 5.1 years to 8 years - Asst. Manager/ Dy. Manager/ Incharge
4. 8 years to 12 years - Manager / Sr. Manager
5. 12 years and above - May consider him DGM, GM, and VP

According to their experience, you can:

01) Salary Maintenance - Payroll Executive / Sr. Payroll Executive
02) ESI, PF, Insurance maintenance - Admin Executive
03) Recruiting someone - Recruiter or Sr. Recruiter / Manager Recruiter
04) Very well-versed in basic accounts - Account Executive / Sr. Executive Account
05) Purchasing Materials - Purchase Executive / Sr. Executive Purchase
06) Store room management - Store Keeper / Store In-charge / Inventory Keeper / Inventory In-charge
07) Quoting new tender - Executive Tender / Sr. Executive Tender / Asst. Manager Tender

I hope the above information will be helpful to you.

Thank you.
tajsateesh
Hello Vikash Sharma,

I think you got it wrong. What Mohan was referring to was ONE EMPLOYEE who does the list of activities mentioned. Please correct me if I am right/wrong, Mohan. If I am right, I feel, depending on the level of this person, he can be designated as an Administration Executive/Assistant.

Regards, TS
vikash1017
Hi TAJ,

English is a very funny language :) Mr. Mohan should have written "Employees," but he mentioned "employee." In his first line, he mentioned that only 7 persons are working and all are doing everyone's work. He displayed 7 department queries; that's why I have guided him. :)

Please let me know if you need further assistance.
tajsateesh
You bet, Vikash Sharma :-)

I recollect an old movie dialogue: 'put' is put, but 'but' is but. That's English for you!

The ball's in Mohan's court now.

Rgds, TS
8Mohan8
First, I wish to express my thanks to Mr. Vikesh, and I will follow your post from now on. I am very thankful to all of you for sharing your honorable replies.
8Mohan8
First, I wish to express my thanks to Mr. Vikesh, and I will follow your posts hereafter. I am very thankful to all of you for sharing your honorable replies.
Canute Rodrigues
Hope he is asking about one person only undertaking all the below work:

01) Salary Maintenance
02) ESI, PF, Insurance maintenance
03) Recruiting someone
04) very well in basic accounts also
05) Purchasing Materials
06) Store room management
07) Quoting new tender

He has a combined work of HR, Accounts, and store. Hence, he can be designated as Admin Executive / Admin Asst. Manager / Admin Manager.

C. F. Rodrigues
nipuna
Hi all,

As per my understanding, the following things are there:

1. There are only 7 employees.
2. Everybody does all the work.
3. Mohan mentioned 7 areas of work.

So, in this situation, he wants to designate all the 7 employees and prefer all of them to work in their respective areas only. (Mohan, correct me if I'm wrong). In this situation, he can take advice from Vikash, who mentioned the things very clearly.
jagdishkmunnar
[QUOTE=8Mohan8;1570309]
Hi Seniors,

This is Mohan. I am in the process of implementing HR activities in my company. My office contains 7 persons only. Everybody handles all tasks, and there is no system in place since I joined.

For the past month, I have organized everything into a system. However, one issue remains – the "Designation" for the employee who performs the following activities:

01) Salary Maintenance
02) ESI, PF, Insurance Maintenance
03) Recruiting someone
04) Proficient in basic accounts
05) Purchasing Materials
06) Store Room Management
07) Quoting new tenders

I am particularly confused when considering the designation for this employee.

Please share your suggestions here. I appreciate your help.

Dear Sir,

Since you have seven staff members handling different spheres of activities, and the question is regarding assigning them proper "Designations," it is quite straightforward to categorize them as follows:

1. Salary & Maintenance
2. ESI, PF, Insurance Maintenance: A Clerk with minimal experience can be designated as a "Junior Assistant."
3. Recruiting Someone: An experienced staff member can be designated as a "Placement Officer."
4. Proficient in Basic Accounting: Depending on experience and qualifications, this employee can be designated as an "Accounts Officer."
5. Purchasing Materials: If qualified in Material Management, the designation can be Purchase Manager; otherwise, Purchase Officer.
6. Store Room Management: Assuming a mix of clerical work and stock management, he can be designated as a Store Assistant, later transitioning to Stores Officer as experience grows.
7. Quoting New Tenders: For clerical work, the designation can be Purchase Executive.

The nature of the mentioned works appears to classify under "workmen" per the Industrial Dispute Act, lacking control or creative authority. Designations may be adjusted based on wage structure, experience, qualification, and Employment Contracts.

Regards,

Jagdish K.
Associate/Consultant - Corporate Links, Kochi (Corporate Links - Consortium of Consultants)
+91 9947662384
jagdishkmunnar@gmail.com[/email]
vikash1017
Hi Taj,

I think you people have a lot of knowledge, but sometimes it may not help you. :)

tajsateesh
Yes, Vikash Sharma... you are right.

I guess it's not for nothing that the saying goes: Learning is a life-long process. You need to keep learning until you drop dead :-)

Regards,
TS
If you are knowledgeable about any fact, resource or experience related to this topic - please add your views. For articles and copyrighted material please only cite the original source link. Each contribution will make this page a resource useful for everyone. Join To Contribute