Hi all,
One of my managers in my department leads the HR business applications team. We currently have PeopleSoft (tons of custom functions), some .NET tools, Cornerstone LMS, iCIMS eRecruiting, and a few custom-built leave request systems.
For 2011, our HR Dept is deploying a new 'cultural change' to enable more bottom-up / 2.0 mentality, including enhanced goal alignment, enhanced 360 performance feedback, and new compensation management model. However, rather than focusing on solid employee mindset changes and communication, HR is focusing on deploying 'fancy (& complicated) apps', and hoping to use 'fancy apps' to change employee mindsets and behaviors. Also, instead of adopting SaaS tools, they're insisting that IT builds custom / unique tools to support the cultural initiative (which is killing my team). Moreover, no employee surveys have been conducted for the past 3 years, which makes the new culture change a bit groundless.
If anyone could provide some opinions on the following I'd really appreciate it:
1. It doesn't feel right that HR is focusing on technical tools instead of fundamental people mindset change -- what should be the guiding rules here?
2. Corp HR is insisting on rolling out new tools all within 3 to 4 months. Based on past case studies, how fast could a company of 5,000 adopt a new way of working? (frequent goal setting and alignment, rolling peer non-anonymous 360 perf rating, etc.)
3. HR is strongly driving the user interface designs and making the tools difficult to use. For example, objective setting process would go from a few mouse clicks and fields to 4 to 5 times the clicks/fields in the new system. Are there best practices on keeping HR tools simple, straight forward, and place the focus be on HR-manager-employee interactions?
4. Do more fancy HR tools alone really help improve employee performance / increase productivity? (so far, I've only seen dramatic results in enterprise social media deployment cases, but our HR is ignoring that trend)
Since we're a software company, the mentality to have lots of "custom-built" could be natural, but I just want to find a good balance so everything is more digestible and sustainable for the long term.
Sorry for the long post - thanks in advance!
Steve
One of my managers in my department leads the HR business applications team. We currently have PeopleSoft (tons of custom functions), some .NET tools, Cornerstone LMS, iCIMS eRecruiting, and a few custom-built leave request systems.
For 2011, our HR Dept is deploying a new 'cultural change' to enable more bottom-up / 2.0 mentality, including enhanced goal alignment, enhanced 360 performance feedback, and new compensation management model. However, rather than focusing on solid employee mindset changes and communication, HR is focusing on deploying 'fancy (& complicated) apps', and hoping to use 'fancy apps' to change employee mindsets and behaviors. Also, instead of adopting SaaS tools, they're insisting that IT builds custom / unique tools to support the cultural initiative (which is killing my team). Moreover, no employee surveys have been conducted for the past 3 years, which makes the new culture change a bit groundless.
If anyone could provide some opinions on the following I'd really appreciate it:
1. It doesn't feel right that HR is focusing on technical tools instead of fundamental people mindset change -- what should be the guiding rules here?
2. Corp HR is insisting on rolling out new tools all within 3 to 4 months. Based on past case studies, how fast could a company of 5,000 adopt a new way of working? (frequent goal setting and alignment, rolling peer non-anonymous 360 perf rating, etc.)
3. HR is strongly driving the user interface designs and making the tools difficult to use. For example, objective setting process would go from a few mouse clicks and fields to 4 to 5 times the clicks/fields in the new system. Are there best practices on keeping HR tools simple, straight forward, and place the focus be on HR-manager-employee interactions?
4. Do more fancy HR tools alone really help improve employee performance / increase productivity? (so far, I've only seen dramatic results in enterprise social media deployment cases, but our HR is ignoring that trend)
Since we're a software company, the mentality to have lots of "custom-built" could be natural, but I just want to find a good balance so everything is more digestible and sustainable for the long term.
Sorry for the long post - thanks in advance!
Steve