Hi Bhavna,
I respect your concerns. I have gone through such situations many times, and based on my experience, I can state that when we diagnose a situation, there are always pros and cons, which may be right or wrong.
If a beggar is asking for money, then Maslow's hierarchy is still applicable. However, among all beggars, if one beggar uses the wrong technique, then it is a matter for reconsideration. If a murder occurs in society, there is a cause behind it. That's why we say, "everyone is right in their place." Nevertheless, using illegal means will not lead to success, even if it is for your betterment. That's why we adhere to the "principle of natural justice."
If we run the HR department with humility and generosity, what is the purpose of issuing warning letters and show-cause notices, even if an employee makes a mistake with a genuine reason? They might have been unconscious during work due to hectic work schedules, social consequences, etc.
For instance, if an employee's daughter is hospitalized, and the shift manager, facing a shortage of staff after working a 48-hour shift, calls the employee to duty despite the critical condition, do you think the employee will work willingly? And if the employee makes a mistake, will we issue a show-cause notice against them?
If two employees, both in difficult circumstances, approach their work differently, for example, one uses a fake salary slip to increase their salary, and the other is a hard worker who willingly works 10-12 hours a day, always ready for work, who would you choose?
To counsel and warn the person with the fake salary slip or to support the hard worker? Consider the hard worker. What mistake has he made if he is living an honest life?
I believe our approach towards everyone should be rooted in humility and humanitarianism, but we cannot condone actions that are completely illegal.
You have only warned the individual, which may prevent them from making the same mistake in the future regarding the fake salary slip. But if you believe the person possesses good qualities, then the current company may either terminate or warn them in writing, so that they or their future generations will not resort to such shortcuts in life. If the person is a valuable asset, they will surely find another job in the market.
I strictly adhere to certain principles in life, yet I still provide opportunities to those who have been terminated, with a welcoming speech that their true journey has just begun, and they should strive to prove themselves as "the best."
I firmly believe that "illegal" means illegal in every aspect.
This is my opinion. If it causes any offense, I apologize.
Regards,
Virendra Zope