Hi all,
I am about to finish my MBA in HR. We've had intense discussions and ample articles and cases on this topic. Here are the answers as I see it. I hope it will prove useful to you.
"Do you really believe Mr. Birla's statement that STAYERS are equally important? As the trend goes, it's stayers who have to perform well in comparison with stars, else their jobs would be at stake. I foresee this trend in the coming era."
I agree with Mr. Birla's statement, but I am a bit inclined towards this viewpoint. The truth is that the average or "stayers," as they are called, are the sustenance. However, if fresh and better talent comes in, then their jobs are at stake. Hence, I agree that some changes will come about, but there is a limit to it. How many times can the world record in the Olympics be broken, especially by how much margin?
"Should pay/salary rise be linked to PMS?"
I would suggest that pay not be linked in the first few years of its implementation. Only when the employees are sure that the process is transparent and also for their development can they trust it. Then, depending on the culture, further steps can be taken.
"Grievance handling process, especially for those who feel rated lower than expected."
Grievance handling does not require a special cell or unit. If the process is transparent, then it is sufficient for the raters to directly talk to the grievancee.
Thank you.