Safety posters would certainly create some awareness and lead to a reduction in the accident rate during that period. However, it is temporary. Even when the posters are present, Plant Managers and Supervisors often focus solely on quantity/quality, neglecting the safety of the workers/machines, rendering the money spent as waste. Essentially, the behavior patterns of all employees, from top to bottom, need to change.
Besides posters and other threat/punitive methods, workers are concerned about their wages. At the beginning and end of the shift, everyone is focused on the numbers. Workers may engage in "At Risk" behaviors during the shift, leading to accidents. If a plant manager disregards a machine guard, supervisors are likely to follow suit. Workers may feel confused and drawn to incentives, prioritizing numbers over safety, ultimately working in an "At Risk" environment.
In my experience, at one unit, a well-defined maintenance/safety procedure based on corporate/unit policies in the US was in place. The policy required a "line clear" before maintenance/tool change, involving multiple approvals. However, the implementation lacked as operators were reluctant to document or seek approvals due to the prevailing work culture.
I strongly believe that negative work behaviors by employees are often a result of management system/procedural failures rather than personal factors. For instance, if an electrical worker requests a face shield/goggles and is denied due to stock issues or dismissive responses, the worker cannot be blamed for working without proper safety gear. The responsibility lies with the flawed system and procedures set by the management.
Fostering a behavior-level approach is the most effective method for promoting safe practices at work.
Babu Alexander
09940689880