Dear Rajkumar,
Let me share my experience with you regarding training and development activities.
It is a common problem perceived by many HR people.
First and foremost, the thing is to understand the purpose of training rather than its implementation and results.
We will take the example given by you regarding Time Management.
Let us see what may be the reasons in this example:
1. People are coming late to the office.
2. People did not reply on time or did not work on projects (projects do not get completed within the time frame).
3. Work does not get completed during working hours or the time frame per task/projects (late working hours also consume money), etc.
If the VP - Operations or HR does not provide/have clear instructions on what the real reason behind the training program is, then no matter how good the training program is, it is non-profitable and does not yield any results.
So, till now, the purpose is not clear.
Another myth is that every training program gives fast results. Then the question arises, has a specific time frame been maintained to observe and evaluate the training program? Again, in the same example of time management, people do not show any change in their behavior/attitude from the next day of the training program. So, what is the time frame for evaluation?
As you are aware, training programs are based on the following requirements only:
1. Organizational changes in processes/practices/procedures/technology.
2. Job/work-based - tasks are going to change, for example, an admin person who has experience in PF/ESI asked to handle payroll. So, payroll package training is required (just an example).
3. Individual requirements - An individual employee may come with his or her own suggestions about training requirements based on his competency mapping or he thinks that he is quite suitable for another job with some training.
Hence, depending on purpose and time frame, training programs need to be arranged to achieve expected outcomes.
Hope it will be useful.
For any questions/suggestions, kindly revert back.
Regards,
Shailendra