Dear all,
I would like to add a corollary to what Mr. Prasad has already deliberated.
Under mediclaim, NO OUT-PATIENT TREATMENT IS ALLOWED BY ALMOST ALL OF THE COMPANIES. THE CLAIM AMOUNT IS RESTRICTED TO THE VALUE OF THE SUM-INSURED (E.G., A PERSON HAS TAKEN A POLICY OF 1 LAKH. SUPPOSE HE UNDERGOES A HEART BYPASS SURGERY, WHICH COSTS AROUND 2.5 LAKH. THEN MEDICLAIM ALLOWS YOU AROUND 90,000 OR IN AN IDEAL CASE 1 LAKH. NOT MORE THAN THAT. BUT ESI HAS NO UPPER LIMIT ON THE CLAIM. IN CASES SUCH AS RENAL TRANSPLANTS, THE BILL MAY SHOOT UP TO 20 LAKHS EVEN THEN THE AMOUNT IS RELEASED.
The most important highlight of the ESI scheme is that "THE ABOVE-SAID BENEFIT IS NOT RESTRICTED TO THE EMPLOYEE ALONE. BUT THE SAME BENEFIT IS PAYABLE TO HIS SPOUSE, CHILDREN, AND DEPENDENT FATHER & MOTHER WITHOUT ANY SUB-LIMIT. Whether it is possible for a private/commercial player to give such benefits. Then how can the benefits be superior to ESI at the same costs to the company. Hence the question of getting an exemption would probably not arise.
Best wishes, Ramesh