You should have given me a call before referring to what I have suggested or replied to you regarding FR. I received a call from someone at GDCL. I cannot recall his name. Whoever it was, if his intention was to clear the concept or share knowledge, I would welcome that. However, it seems he was more interested in conveying his ideas to me and persuading me to agree with them.
For the future, please do not blindly follow the suggestions you receive through this forum. They may also be incorrect. Most of the time, when I reply, I ensure that I am satisfied with the answer I am posting before responding.
Arguments Presented
Now, here are his arguments, which I felt I should present to the forum to get the views of others:
1. He claims that LTI and Fatal incidents are not the same, and we do not need to consider or count fatal accidents when calculating the FR. For example, if one LTI and one Fatal accident occur, the total number of accidents to be calculated for FR is one.
I still do not agree with this.
If two fatal accidents occur in a plant and no LTIs happen, will the frequency rate be "ZERO"?
What is the logic behind such an argument?
Mr. Ahammad, I urge you to share this website with your friend/manager who is debating this topic with you. Let him provide his input on this forum. If it is correct and justifiable, we will learn from it.
We are also awaiting comments from other members.
Thank you.