With due respect to you and President-HR and with no offence meant to both of you, I still differ with views expressed by you.
Please let me know have you come across any company or organization where both HR Manager and Manager-HR are occupying respective posts simultaneously?
Will it not be wiser to designate the person with bigger role and higher authority as Sr. Manager or something like Manager-Corporate HR?
Why create a haze by giving confusing designations? Is it not better to designate a person which will convey his/her position in hierarchy and function/role in an unambiguous way?
Why will a company or an organization create confusion knowingly by designating two individuals with similar looking designations but with big difference in level, role and responsibility?
Originally Posted by Purple haze
The Hr Manager is responsible for managing and supervising the personnel department within a company whereas the Manager Hr guides and manages the overall provision of Human Resources services, policies & programmes for the entire company.
In case example and explanation given by you above is real, then the very first thing Manager-HR, in this example would do is to change his own designation as Sr. Manager or DGM or at least Manager-Corporate HR to differentiate himself from HR Manager. After all he has mandate to do that (Manager Hr guides and manages the overall provision of Human Resources services, policies & programmes for the entire company)
Thanks & Regards