With due respect to you and President-HR, and with no offense meant to both of you, I still differ with the views expressed by you. Please let me know, have you come across any company or organization where both the HR Manager and Manager-HR are occupying respective posts simultaneously?
Designation Clarity
Will it not be wiser to designate the person with the bigger role and higher authority as Sr. Manager or something like Manager-Corporate HR? Why create a haze by giving confusing designations? Is it not better to designate a person in a way that will convey his/her position in the hierarchy and function/role unambiguously?
Why will a company or an organization create confusion knowingly by designating two individuals with similar-looking designations but with a big difference in level, role, and responsibility?
Role Distinction
The HR Manager is responsible for managing and supervising the personnel department within a company, whereas the Manager-HR guides and manages the overall provision of Human Resources services, policies, and programs for the entire company.
In case the example and explanation given by you above are real, then the very first thing the Manager-HR, in this example, would do is to change his own designation to Sr. Manager or DGM, or at least Manager-Corporate HR to differentiate himself from the HR Manager. After all, he has the mandate to do that (Manager-HR guides and manages the overall provision of Human Resources services, policies, and programs for the entire company).
Thanks & Regards
"I have tried to convey my view after having consulted someone who happens to be the President HR of a reputed concern. There is a difference in terms of roles: One is a generalist, and the other has a specific role to play."