Would like to share an activity that we have done multiple times with different teams, which has unfailingly provided a lot of fun and learning for participants. We call it FOOTZA :-). I will try to give as many details as possible so that you can run it the right way. Here goes—this is straight from our internal activity manual. Hope you find it useful.
This activity demands the team to design and build the tallest tower made only of humans. To make things challenging enough, the highest point must be a human foot or feet, plus there is a time limit. Without a doubt, the members must put their heads together to come up with methods that will give them the tallest human tower. Some desired outcomes are:
- Creativity
- Execute according to plan
Equipment
Prepare sufficient equipment according to the number of activities required for each run. The guide is below:
- Props are not absolutely necessary
Select a piece of open area that is free from potential hazards. Knowing its size, prepare enough props and position them strategically to maximize the activity's learning value. Ensure all participants are aware of the potential hazards around them. Generally, the facilitator should take note of common environmental hazards like steep drop-offs, exposed drains, the presence of dangerous insects and animals, ambient temperature, etc. Always stay alert to the general readiness of the participants, like proper attire and having sufficient rest after any physically demanding activities.
Instructions To Participants
- Each team is required to build the tallest human tower
- The highest point of the tower must be a foot or feet
- Purely human-powered, no external aids are allowed
- The team has 10 minutes to design and build
- The official execution will commence after the given 5 minutes
- One attempt is granted for each team to execute their method
- On safety:
- If any lifting of personnel is required, the lifted person must be supported at three points, i.e., head/neck, lumbar, and legs
- The rest of the members must be alert and offer spotting (hands up) when anyone is lifted
Conduct Of Activity
By structuring the Footza into stages, the participants will likely learn at a deeper level. The general readiness of the participants should be noted by the facilitators. Success breeds confidence, and progression will allow it to happen. Physical safety, emotional safety, and skill competency are just some aspects for the facilitator to consider when organizing Footza. Cover the safety pointers before they begin. Highlight to them the proper technique of lifting a person if there is a clear intention to do so. Cover the dos and don’ts of the activity. Elevate their environmental awareness by pointing out certain areas or fixtures in the room that have potential hazards.
Round 1
Get them into pairs and deliver the instructions and necessary demonstration prior to its commencement.
Process Debrief
It is predictable what results can be produced by just two persons. The height they can achieve is conceivable, and they should not be surprised by the outcome. The “Ah-ha” feeling is not expected to be aroused from the first round. As a guide, facilitators could use some of the debriefing questions listed below:
- What are the main considerations for your team (pair)?
- What are the roles created during the process?
- Are you surprised at the outcome? What makes it surprising?
Round 2
With the experiences from round one, challenge the group by asking them if they could break the current highest point. Predictably, the response is asking for more manpower resources, like combining pairs. For this round, two pairs will combine to form a small team. Adhering to the same safety instructions and time format, start them off. As the group size increases, emphasizing safety awareness is paramount. The facilitator should pre-plan the activity and decide the number of rounds to be conducted. The underlying reason for structuring the Footza into stages is to create multiple levels of challenges for participants to handle, thus generating numerous possible learnings from the activity. Multiple rounds also mean progression.
Debriefing Questions Used
Debrief
- How would you describe the activity in short?
- Recall the “Ah-ha” moments. Share with the rest what and why makes it your “Ah-ha” moments.
- What are the insights you have gained from the “Ah-ha” moments?
- What are some helpful behaviors you have observed?
- Can we identify the areas for improvement?
- Identify one insight that might be useful to you.
- To make the insight more relevant, can you point out some application areas that will augment your work performance?
- What would you change to make it better?
- As a team, what is possible to be done to improve the current situation?
Possible Presentations, Storyline, and Metaphors
It is common for teams to choose the tallest person to be at the highest point. A tall person should be reasonably heavier than shorter persons. However, our thinking almost did not register the weight factor; we simply chose to focus on the height due to the requirement of the activity. Some teams will select the shortest person to be at the highest point. The unobvious advantage of a shorter person is easier handling and balancing when elevated, which is not obvious to most teams. Selecting the shortest person can create paradigm shifts for those who harbor no such thoughts at all. Considering a short person as the highest point is simply not conceivable at all. Let's not wait; get the paradigm shifting.
Hope you like it. You can pick up a few more ideas from our website.
Cheers,
Arun Rao
www.focusadventure.in