Understanding Notice Period Buyout and Legal Rights in Employee Termination

ahsan7
Hi Seniors,

My offer letter mentions the following clause:

"You or the company may terminate your service at any time by giving 90 days' notice or basic salary in lieu thereof."

I have received an offer from a company that is willing to wait for 2 months but not for 3 months. Therefore, I have requested my company to relieve me in 2 months. However, it appears that the HR head has sent a memo to all managers to ensure that no employee is relieved without serving the complete notice period of 3 months (ostensibly, this is to arrest attrition).

My question is, is the company within its legal rights to enforce me to serve the complete notice period of 3 months, even though I am willing to serve 2 months and buy out the remaining 1 month?

Please note that the memo mentioned above has not been communicated to the employees, but only to the managers. I have also tried to find this policy on the company's website, and I cannot locate it.

Please also consider the High Court ruling reported in DNA at the following link:
HC upholds buyout of notice period - dnaindia.com

Your views will be very much appreciated.
ahsan7
No replies...

I was hoping there would be some valid points raised, especially with regards to the HC ruling.
If you are knowledgeable about any fact, resource or experience related to this topic - please add your views. For articles and copyrighted material please only cite the original source link. Each contribution will make this page a resource useful for everyone. Join To Contribute