Dear Friends,
Please go through this; I hope this would add value to this discussion topic.
(Here is a question asked by archishagarg)
Respected Sir,
It was a pleasure reading your skill set. I am too young and absolutely not potential enough to comment upon it. But one thing that I would like to know from you as a matter of knowledge alone is that when you yourself support personality tests for matching the right person with the right job, which means you are well-versed in recruitment, don't you think outsourcing it may not be a very profitable deal? I personally feel if you have an efficient HR department, it can best understand the company's requirements. I am referring to this as you had mentioned this as a solution on "how companies can overcome the effects of the recession on compensation." I fail to understand this logic.
Rather, I feel making effective employee engagement strategies can help to some extent. Please correct me if I am wrong. Since you are well-versed in this, you shall better know the pros and cons of the same. I will really be obliged if you could guide me on this issue and your post related to it. I apologize if I am wrong somewhere or if you found me rude anywhere above. I will really be looking forward to your reply.
Posted Yesterday at 06:48 PM by archishagarg
My Dear friend, (Here is my answer)
I strongly support my statement about outsourcing the recruitment process and my skill set mentioned in the above post. I can prove it in practice as well. I request you to go and read my post about how companies can overcome the effects of the recession on compensation. You will find that I have mentioned only the recruitment process, not the selection process. For your information, there is a difference between the recruitment and selection process. Both recruitment and selection are the two phases of the employment process. The differences between the two are:
Recruitment is the process of searching for candidates for employment and stimulating them to apply for jobs in the organization, whereas selection involves the series of steps by which the candidates are screened to choose the most suitable persons for vacant posts. The basic purpose of recruitment is to create a talent pool of candidates to enable the selection of the best candidates for the organization by attracting more employees to apply to the organization. The basic purpose of the selection process is to choose the right candidate to fill the various positions in the organization.
Recruitment is a positive process, i.e., encouraging more employees to apply, whereas selection is a negative process as it involves rejecting unsuitable candidates. Recruitment is concerned with tapping the sources of human resources, whereas selection is concerned with selecting the most suitable candidate through various interviews and tests.
Hence, the recruitment cost involved when the company does recruitment by itself is the cost incurred for job portals (Jobsahead, Monster, and Naukri), the cost of posters and banners, headhunting, internal referrals, the salary of the employee involved in all these activities, PF, ESI, gratuity, superannuation contribution on that salary, annual incentives and bonuses to these employees, training and development costs, and time spent on all these activities.
The most important point is that you may have to bear these costs until you choose the best candidate. Think, when large companies hire hundreds and thousands of employees per year, these costs can take a significant portion of the HR budget and total operating expenses.
On the other hand, when you hire through any recruitment agencies, they will manage the recruitment process from start to finish. Recruitment agencies hold large databases of candidates and can advertise on your behalf. Their advertising methods include both print and online mediums, although the latter has become more common in recent years.
Advantages include:
- Reducing the impact on company resources and time spent on recruitment.
- You can often get a rebate for unsuitable placements within a specific period of time or be provided with another candidate.
- Expertise and knowledge in their specialist field without training costs.
Now the most important point is:
1. Recruitment agencies are paid only when we choose the best candidate.
2. We have to pay only a percentage (10 or 20) of the employee's first-year annual salary.
We do not have to spend the entire treasure.
Now you tell me, which one will be more cost-effective: internal recruitment or through agencies?
ABOUT PERSONALITY TESTS:
I have mentioned the use of personality tests for selecting the right candidate, i.e., for the post-recruitment means the selection process. Personality tests are not the only tool for the selection process; they can be used for many purposes such as:
1. Motivation - understanding the personality of another person, as well as your own, helps in motivating others.
2. Judging behavior style at work, motivation, and thinking styles of people.
3. Career counseling, mentoring, outplacements, and training needs.
4. Employee self-evaluation and development.
5. Learning styles, hence useful in designing training modules and methods.
6. Performance appraisal.
7. Team building.
8. Helps in employee engagement and retention activities.
9. Management development.
10. Sales development.
In this way, we can not only make effective employee engagement strategies but also improve all other HR practices.
I hope I have been able to clear your doubts. If not, feel free to discuss.
I am waiting for your reply.
Thank you.
SATYAM