Dear Laxmikant "ldbhakre"
I agree with you on all three counts - it is hard to get good fresh material, it is always good to repeat GOOD things and many members have not seen earlier posted material.
I
n fact, I am thankful to you, because it is an excellent material, and I had not seen it earlier !
Moreover, I am happy to note that you did not attempt to take any credit for it - "The creator is unknown but whosoever has done this Job must be a intelligent person" - a perfectly right disposition and action.
All I want to request you is; as Mr. Simhan - "nashbramhall" - has rightly pointed alongwith the required link;
just post a LINK to the material which you want to re-post / repeat.
This is not only the right way of referencing (if the whole thing is required to be referred); but it also gives credit where it is due.
Moreover, readers can themselves get benefit of additional / related items associated with that LINK - like some additional information, corrections, additions, opinions of others etc. which add value to the posted material.
I am herewith providing again the link to the original post in CiteHR, for the benefit of all.
https://www.citehr.com/156310-manage...ahabharat.html
It is a relatively new thread, started on 14/04/2009.
Done this way, can anyone accuse me of plagiarism or repeating a post ?
Kindly do keep on giving references of good things that you come across this site. In fact you can refer to NOT JUST ONE, but many such items in A SINGLE POST/THREAD. So go ahead, point out good, exceptional materials; I am sure 100% (why just 90%) people will say its very useful and will thank you for it.
Kindly remember, there is a difference between
attaching an item (as if it is one's own; or gives this impression) and
referring to a link (which is proper, more convenient, and shows concern for the web-server by not saddling it with un-necessary additional storage space).
Regards.