Dear Deepthi and Purnima,
Deepthi, you have pointed out some positive aspects. However, can we discuss the potential costs that may arise for the employer?
Let's consider a scenario where Purnima is from the IT industry and her organization requires contract employees. The process kicks off with back-office verifications, profile checks, and other necessary procedures for each individual. This can consume a significant amount of time and incur costs for the company.
Alternatively, the HR department of Purnima's organization could explore an alternative approach as follows:
If the company needs 15 contract employees, they could initially reach out to about 100 potential candidates within 5 days. From this pool, at least 25 suitable candidates may emerge. On the 6th day, shortlist 20 candidates for the next round. Following a formal HR interview, finalize 15 candidates and maintain the remaining 5 as backups. This ensures that any offer cancellations or rejections can be promptly addressed from the backup pool.
By following this method, the required 15 candidates could be ready by the 8th day, with the possibility of onboarding them the next day. This streamlined process is not only rapid but also cost-effective, representing a significant advancement in recruitment practices.
I trust that this approach will lead to clearer outcomes and enhance the effectiveness of the recruitment process, thereby reducing instances of forged resumes and fake candidates.
Best regards