Dear all,
In my company, there is a strange rule: if you are sick, it will be counted as your normal leave. Regarding normal leaves - we have a quota of just 2 days per month (with the option of accruing). The result is that nobody wants to use these precious days for sick leave and come to the office feeling unwell.
For example, today I feel terrible, but still, I have come to the office, as I didn't plan to be sick and I have plans for my annual leave, which are more interesting than spending it being ill. The question is: is it legal for my boss to merge two different types of leave?
Being an HR manager, I understand the potential for misuse of sick leave, but as a currently sick employee, I want to cry and absolutely disagree. In my country, if you take sick leave for more than 2 days, you have to provide a medical certificate, in accordance with Russian Labor Law. What about India?
In my company, there is a strange rule: if you are sick, it will be counted as your normal leave. Regarding normal leaves - we have a quota of just 2 days per month (with the option of accruing). The result is that nobody wants to use these precious days for sick leave and come to the office feeling unwell.
For example, today I feel terrible, but still, I have come to the office, as I didn't plan to be sick and I have plans for my annual leave, which are more interesting than spending it being ill. The question is: is it legal for my boss to merge two different types of leave?
Being an HR manager, I understand the potential for misuse of sick leave, but as a currently sick employee, I want to cry and absolutely disagree. In my country, if you take sick leave for more than 2 days, you have to provide a medical certificate, in accordance with Russian Labor Law. What about India?