Appraisals in the Workplace - to improve workforce performance

indsujeet
Appraisals in the Workplace

Systems which aim to improve workforce performance have been around since Roman times, when liberal use of the whip was considered an enlightened management technique. However, these days there are workplace directives against beating your staff, so you have to find substitutes. The nasty memo, the e-mail from the boss, or that old chestnut, the shouting match in the corridor are all very well, but nothing beats a good Performance Appraisal to strike real fear into them.

In truth, the above way of looking at things has gone the way of the Roman Empire (we hope), but vestigial feelings that appraisal systems exist as a tool of aggression are common in many workplaces. We believe that more often than not, this stems from a lack of understanding amongst both management and staff of the underlying purpose of the appraisal.

The fundamental purpose of any performance appraisal is simply to help. To help the individual understand their role, to help them maximize their chances of success within the working environment, to help plan their career, and to help the company succeed. If everyone in the organization is aware of this and accepts it to be true, then something wonderful starts to happen.

Staff feel more at ease because they work for a company that helps them do their job. They feel more empowered because they know there is help at hand, and most importantly, their performance improves because they have a better understanding of roles and expectations.

Each performance management appraisal system will be different because each company is different. However, there are some key elements that will appear in every well-constructed system. The checklist below lists these factors. Check them against your own appraisal system to see if you are getting the very best from your staff.

- An appraisal system should have the full support of senior management. Without this, the system will eventually collapse.
- The appraisal system should first have been piloted and then reviewed.
- The intentions of the appraisal system should be clearly communicated to all staff.
- All staff should have training in appraisal techniques. Interviewing skills, giving feedback, and objective setting are all elements that require training to be carried out effectively.
- The system should enable all staff to have clearly established aims and objectives that are linked with the business strategy.
- The appraisal system should follow a cycle of defining the performance that is required, measuring and evaluating it, giving feedback, and sharing information with other parts of the organization.
- The appraisal system should have simple and easily understood documentation supporting it.
- The appraisal system should not be a part of the standard disciplinary procedures of the company.
- The system should be adaptable and encompass all levels of staff in the organization.
- The appraisal system must be subject to ongoing monitoring, review, evaluation, and updating. Remember, that as your business evolves, so must your appraisal procedures.
leolingham2000
Dear Leo Lingham,

I agree with the suggestions.

Whether it's a PA system, 360-degree feedback, or any other tool, it is an instrument in the people development process. The total focus should be on the employee, facilitated by HRM and driven by the line managers. The process should help the employee self-motivate and self-manage their growth potential, with the support of HRM and line management.

Regards,
Leo Lingham
Anjali_Yadav
Hi Indsujeet,

I totally second the requirements of a good performance appraisal system as listed by you.

But I've got a few questions of my own... (many of them may seem unrelated to each other - forgive me for that, just letting my thoughts flow).

How many organizations actually follow an objective appraisal system?

Do people have the time, money, and inclination for it?

Moreover, what happens in the case of expatriates when your boss or you are not around each other for a major part of the year - how can your appraiser appraise you?

One of the major requirements of any performance appraisal system to succeed, in my opinion, is having a two-way communication between the employee and their boss when setting the Key Result Areas (KRA's) or the targets. This communication is necessary because while targets need to be challenging but achievable, they should not be impossible, as that would cause demotivation among employees, leading them to give up without even trying to achieve the targets.

I am more concerned with the scenario in PSU's.

It's ironic as superiors often give good ratings but not excellent ones, as that may attract an inspection to determine if the employee is actually deserving.

It is rare that people maintain a critical incidents list to supplement the ratings they give.

Moreover, even though HR manuals state that there needs to be a periodic review of the goals set, it hardly happens. The HR department does not have the time or energy for follow-up, being preoccupied with the heaps of perfunctory HR tasks and the necessity to go through many people to even get the simplest job done.

No wonder we complain about the culture present at PSU's!

Though I truly believe that with more and more PSU's facing tough competition from the private sector, it's time for them to shape up or ship out.

Especially in the banking sector, with most banks moving towards core banking (the deadline being the year 2007), things should improve. Amen?

That's all from my side.

- Anjali
Jo Verde
Agree to a large extent with previous posts but would further suggest that an all-out change management effort may be required prior to or in conjunction with the introduction of a piloted appraisal process. My experience has been that where process introduction has failed, it has been because PEOPLE are involved and all of the frailties that encompass human attempts to be unbiased and to rise above imperfect appraisal processes poorly implemented.

I have had lots of experience with this issue and have learned from many mistakes. However, when you do it right, the results can be majorly satisfying.

Best Regards, Jo Verde JeMM Consultants
xenhash
Just about every human resources journal that you pick up these days contains an article on implementing a 360-degree performance evaluation system, whereby the work performance of an individual is evaluated not only by a supervisor but also by peers, subordinates, customers, and others familiar with the quality of that person's work. The main aim of every type of evaluation is that the employee gains accurate insight into his effectiveness and aligns his goals and objectives with those of the company.

But I think that appraisals should only be linked to development, not pay and promotions. When they are linked to compensation decisions, they lose their power as a development tool.

Concerns were voiced initially about whether the process would be too time-consuming. This can be resolved in a way that, with experience, the evaluations take less time. Computerized forms may soon replace paper forms, further reducing the time needed to complete and route the forms and to tabulate results.
HR_Admin
Okie.. it is actually for appraisal for the following:
- Confirmation
- Annual Assessment
- Upgrading etc

Well, I am in a manufacturing company.. below are some of the positions:
a) Operators
b) Line Leader / Shift Leader
c) Assistant Engineer / Senior Engineer / Maintenance Technician
d) Manager - Plant (Overall) / Production / QA / Finance / Logistics / General & Operation / Sales & Marketing
e) Executive - Admin / HR / Accountant / Sales Coordinator etc

How do I come up with a good appraisal?
Thanks & Regards
HR_Admin
If you are knowledgeable about any fact, resource or experience related to this topic - please add your views. For articles and copyrighted material please only cite the original source link. Each contribution will make this page a resource useful for everyone. Join To Contribute