Dear Friends,
Very good morning.
As Mr. Naren has already briefed about the Bangalore informal meet, there is nothing left for me to add. I appreciate the initiative taken by Mr. Naren, Mr. Rajaram, and Mr. Kourien. All three members are the most senior among all members and have guided us significantly.
During the introductions and conversations with all respected members, Mr. Kourien proposed an interesting topic for us to debate.
Topic:
"Why Human as Resources." His view is totally different from other HR experts/scholars, and we have accepted his views for a national debate through this forum.
Now, my point is, why can't we say "Human Potential" instead of "Human Resource"? I would like to request all members to provide their views on this matter. I strongly advocate for "Human Potential" in place of "Human Resource."
Most welcome to all forum members to participate in this debate.
For Bangalore CiteHR members: In the next meeting, I will come with my topic for presentation.
Regards,
Sidhehswar
Very good morning.
As Mr. Naren has already briefed about the Bangalore informal meet, there is nothing left for me to add. I appreciate the initiative taken by Mr. Naren, Mr. Rajaram, and Mr. Kourien. All three members are the most senior among all members and have guided us significantly.
During the introductions and conversations with all respected members, Mr. Kourien proposed an interesting topic for us to debate.
Topic:
"Why Human as Resources." His view is totally different from other HR experts/scholars, and we have accepted his views for a national debate through this forum.
Now, my point is, why can't we say "Human Potential" instead of "Human Resource"? I would like to request all members to provide their views on this matter. I strongly advocate for "Human Potential" in place of "Human Resource."
Most welcome to all forum members to participate in this debate.
For Bangalore CiteHR members: In the next meeting, I will come with my topic for presentation.
Regards,
Sidhehswar