The issue does not pertain to the authority of a Labour Officer but to drafting a letter for Ditti's clients for onward submission to the Labour Officer. Some drafts have also been uploaded. If satisfied, anyone can have it. That's all.
Now the discussion has taken a turn by questioning the authority of the Labour Officer. In fact, a Labour Officer is not an employee like those employed by private organizations. He has quasi-judicial powers conferred on him through various labor enactments. His roles and authorities will vary according to circumstances noted in different Acts. Therefore, we cannot specify his authorities, but they always exist. He can be a Conciliation Officer by virtue of the Industrial Disputes Act, the authority for settling gratuity issues, preside over conciliations related to Bonus, address matters connected with Payment of Wages and implementation of Minimum Wages, and so on. He can enter the premises of your work at any time without prior intimation and collect evidence from the employees. Whatever the workers disclose about your organization, wages paid to them, or facilities offered to them during his inspection shall be binding on you. We are not supposed to question the intentions of a Labour Officer who can request any employer to produce any record, books, or files for evidence in any inquiry he conducts. If the Labour Officer demands a declaration that an employee is not covered by ESI, the employer is expected to provide it. The declaration is in the form of a certificate stating that the employee is not under ESI coverage. While the Labour Officer has not requested the wage register and related documents, one member has been misled to believe that submission of pay slips, wage register, etc., is necessary only when the Officer is not satisfied with the provided declaration. Therefore, I see no issue with providing the information requested by the Labour Officer.
Regards,
Madhu.T.K