Dear Seniors,
Here is an interesting doubt of mine. Kindly clarify.
As per Ramayan, Hanumanji was the Head HR and Senapathy to Shri Ram. We all know that Hanumanji has enormous power and is unbeatable. If he had decided, he could have destroyed whole Lanka singlehandedly and brought Sita back. He need not even touch her while bringing her back to Shri Ram. He could have lifted the whole Ashok Van where she was imprisoned with a single finger. However, he did not do so.
When he was asked why he did not do it, his reply was, "I was not told to do so." Being a Head HR, is it not his duty without being told to do something? Even otherwise, Shriram should have asked him to do so, which he also did not.
Then who is to be blamed?
Please reply from an HR point of view and not like an atheist who does not believe in God and other things. Let's not deviate from the issue.
Thanks and regards,
S. Kumar
Here is an interesting doubt of mine. Kindly clarify.
As per Ramayan, Hanumanji was the Head HR and Senapathy to Shri Ram. We all know that Hanumanji has enormous power and is unbeatable. If he had decided, he could have destroyed whole Lanka singlehandedly and brought Sita back. He need not even touch her while bringing her back to Shri Ram. He could have lifted the whole Ashok Van where she was imprisoned with a single finger. However, he did not do so.
When he was asked why he did not do it, his reply was, "I was not told to do so." Being a Head HR, is it not his duty without being told to do something? Even otherwise, Shriram should have asked him to do so, which he also did not.
Then who is to be blamed?
Please reply from an HR point of view and not like an atheist who does not believe in God and other things. Let's not deviate from the issue.
Thanks and regards,
S. Kumar