Hi friends,
I started this blog to share information on the latest judgments of the Central Administrative Tribunal, high courts, and the apex court on service and disciplinary matters pertaining to government/public sector employees. I would love my friends to share their views/information on the topic of 'sexual harassment.' The specific point is what kind of procedure the complaint mechanism committee would be required to follow. The proviso below Rule 14(1) of the CCS (CCA) Rules requires that the procedure for the inquiry as laid down under the rules should, as far as practicable, be followed.
I have come across a judgment of the Delhi High Court on 18th November 2006 - Sudeep Khurana Vs. Delhi Transco, where the court directed to follow the procedures as prescribed under Rule 14. Any views and information on any other judgment after Vishaka's case, Apparel Export Promotion case?
Regards,
Ravijudge
I started this blog to share information on the latest judgments of the Central Administrative Tribunal, high courts, and the apex court on service and disciplinary matters pertaining to government/public sector employees. I would love my friends to share their views/information on the topic of 'sexual harassment.' The specific point is what kind of procedure the complaint mechanism committee would be required to follow. The proviso below Rule 14(1) of the CCS (CCA) Rules requires that the procedure for the inquiry as laid down under the rules should, as far as practicable, be followed.
I have come across a judgment of the Delhi High Court on 18th November 2006 - Sudeep Khurana Vs. Delhi Transco, where the court directed to follow the procedures as prescribed under Rule 14. Any views and information on any other judgment after Vishaka's case, Apparel Export Promotion case?
Regards,
Ravijudge