Dear Sir,
In one of my earlier companies, they were following the "NOTIONAL WAGES" for the determination of coverage under ESI, which is also as per the Act. The Act states that, for coverage under the Act, Wages Paid/Payable should be taken.
However, one of the ESI Inspectors is interpreting that for the determination of coverage, consideration of "Notional Wages" should be restricted to Basic and DA only. Is this correct? If so, is there any Case Law for this? If wrong, is there any Case Law in support of this?
Further, the ESI Act nowhere mentions 'Notional Wages'; it only refers to Paid/payable WAGES. Payable is nothing BUT the total salary irrespective of his attendance.
I would like to have the views of the learned stalwarts of CITE HR on this for my benefit as well as the benefit of others.
With Best Regards,
R BALAJI
In one of my earlier companies, they were following the "NOTIONAL WAGES" for the determination of coverage under ESI, which is also as per the Act. The Act states that, for coverage under the Act, Wages Paid/Payable should be taken.
However, one of the ESI Inspectors is interpreting that for the determination of coverage, consideration of "Notional Wages" should be restricted to Basic and DA only. Is this correct? If so, is there any Case Law for this? If wrong, is there any Case Law in support of this?
Further, the ESI Act nowhere mentions 'Notional Wages'; it only refers to Paid/payable WAGES. Payable is nothing BUT the total salary irrespective of his attendance.
I would like to have the views of the learned stalwarts of CITE HR on this for my benefit as well as the benefit of others.
With Best Regards,
R BALAJI