Dear Cirus,
I personally feel these type of issues might have two sides. So the comment that MD's action is wrong is agreeable to all of us.
But these should have gone into a details discussion between the two and then only we can come to a conclusion. Because the email was not given certain details like Does the terminated person is against policy or has he informed or does he use unlawful words etc.... The email gives details only about the MD's action.
We can give only the general view from this issue that for indutory email like this - termination might be too harsh or wrong. But I can argue that if the contract mentioned clearly sending unnecessary emails including fancy introductory letters will have adverse effect - then the action can be justified.
Hope someone will agree with me.
Thanks - N. Hari
I personally feel these type of issues might have two sides. So the comment that MD's action is wrong is agreeable to all of us.
But these should have gone into a details discussion between the two and then only we can come to a conclusion. Because the email was not given certain details like Does the terminated person is against policy or has he informed or does he use unlawful words etc.... The email gives details only about the MD's action.
We can give only the general view from this issue that for indutory email like this - termination might be too harsh or wrong. But I can argue that if the contract mentioned clearly sending unnecessary emails including fancy introductory letters will have adverse effect - then the action can be justified.
Hope someone will agree with me.
Thanks - N. Hari