The 360-degree appraisal is a great concept on paper but it falls flat in implementation. Its success lies in the way it is implemented. There are very few companies, especially large ones, that have made good use of it. The ones who have failed with it have just adopted it and distributed the forms without proper definition and explanation. The theory/implementation plan assumes:
- most staff do not work in a vacuum
- staff interact daily with people to get the job done
- interaction could be internal or external with people
- internal interactions could include upwards, downwards, or sideways communication
- external interactions could include customers, suppliers, etc.
For the success of the 360-degree appraisal, each staff job must be analyzed, each staff's daily interactions analyzed, and only those who have regular (at least once a week) contacts should be given the form. Remember, you don't appraise the person; you appraise the person's performance. If you only contact a person once in six months, you can hardly evaluate their performance. The performance appraisal must be descriptive and not a value judgment based on moral standards.
Performance appraisals are based on set criteria and not wishful thinking. Those who are selected to receive the forms must be briefed well about the criteria and how to use them. This is often the reason for the failure of 360-degree appraisals in many cases.
You have to do a lot of homework within the organization. If you give me one position/job description, I might be able to provide you with some help/direction.
Regards,
Leo Lingham
_________________
Leo Lingham
Principal: BestBusiCon Pty Ltd