DIGNITY OF MEN:IS IT UNNCESSAY FOR CITEHR?
Under the thread "BIG BOSS PREMJI AZMI ALONG WITHE COLLEAGUES HIT BY DV ACT" I had traced out the origin of neglect of dignity of men in Article 51A(e) of the Constitution of India. Since then indignity against the men has come a long way upto hitting Prem ji Azmi and his colleagues by DV Act. This will now go on in leaps and bounds. To help reverse the situation I had suggested a small amendment, that is, addition of "and men". There is only one post supporting this suggestiion.
This reminds me the result of impeachment motion aganst Supreme Court judge Jusice Ramaswamy. In favour of the motion there were 196 votes and against there were none. But these 196 votes were much below the 2/3rd votes of the members present in the house. So the impeachment motion failed.
Now from some 20000 members in citehr there is only one support for the amendment of the Article 51A(e) of The Constitution of India to add "and men" to care the dignity of men as well.
So I think citehr does not want that the dignity of men to be cared. Am I right?
regards
Under the thread "BIG BOSS PREMJI AZMI ALONG WITHE COLLEAGUES HIT BY DV ACT" I had traced out the origin of neglect of dignity of men in Article 51A(e) of the Constitution of India. Since then indignity against the men has come a long way upto hitting Prem ji Azmi and his colleagues by DV Act. This will now go on in leaps and bounds. To help reverse the situation I had suggested a small amendment, that is, addition of "and men". There is only one post supporting this suggestiion.
This reminds me the result of impeachment motion aganst Supreme Court judge Jusice Ramaswamy. In favour of the motion there were 196 votes and against there were none. But these 196 votes were much below the 2/3rd votes of the members present in the house. So the impeachment motion failed.
Now from some 20000 members in citehr there is only one support for the amendment of the Article 51A(e) of The Constitution of India to add "and men" to care the dignity of men as well.
So I think citehr does not want that the dignity of men to be cared. Am I right?
regards